SigFox vs. LoRa

If you like it, share it


Comparison n.1

Even though both networks position themselves similarly in the IoT market, they have significant technological and marketing differences.
While SigFox aims to become a global IoT operator, LoRa alliance wants to provide a technology that allows other companies to enable a global IoT.
Neither SigFox nor LoRa offer encrypted communications

(From: Raed’s Blog)

Go on TOP


Comparison n.2

Coverage
LoRa: less than 14 Km
Sigfox: less than 17 Km

Signal Bandwidth
LoRa: on CSS (Chirp spread spectrum)
Sigfox: on UNB (Ultra narrowband)  — higher spectral efficiency and can mitigate the noise better

Usage
LoRa: uses more bandwidth
Sigfox: is very practical for infrequent transmissions and offers longer battery life

Business Model
LoRa: can by deployed on your own to just cover your local area
Sigfox: is a network operator, so you wait for them to deploy, and you pay a subscription fee

Security
LoRa:  weaker compared to Sigfox but I believe it will be improving
Sigfox: is better in preventing replay and man-in-the-middle attacks

 

(From: Annie’s Moment)

Go on TOP


Comparison n.3

(From: Rakon)

Go on TOP